Sample size! 2 plants (per sub-species) is too little. To get results with any significance (I’m not about to get into statistical jargon) you need a sample size of 7 at the very least. I’m still curious to see the results, but this wouldn’t make it to any meta-analysis.
Another thing which is unclear is why use the 60W HLG model, rather than another larger QB driven to the same wattage as the Viper.
Yes, hanging the more powerful light higher up should mitigate part of the difference between the two, partially leveling the field, but why not get more comparable players to begin with? It would make results that much clearer.
For sure. I’m well aware of the validity of this experiment – I just don’t have the means to run 10 of each type. I’m more curious to see if the average Joe can get the same results as the super popular Vipar with half the power – I don’t aim to provide much meaningful data from it.
One reason I went with the HLG 65 is the price of it. If people can spend about the same as the Vipar and get equal results with half the power, that’s a good deal. I am confident that the 135W kit would blow it out of the water and felt this would be a more equal matchup.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Really hope to see quantum board out powering vipar. I’ve used vipar with OK results. But these newer gen leds are working like dreams 🙂
I will be very impressed if it can match the Vipar since it’s running at literally half the power!
Sample size! 2 plants (per sub-species) is too little. To get results with any significance (I’m not about to get into statistical jargon) you need a sample size of 7 at the very least. I’m still curious to see the results, but this wouldn’t make it to any meta-analysis.
Another thing which is unclear is why use the 60W HLG model, rather than another larger QB driven to the same wattage as the Viper.
Yes, hanging the more powerful light higher up should mitigate part of the difference between the two, partially leveling the field, but why not get more comparable players to begin with? It would make results that much clearer.
For sure. I’m well aware of the validity of this experiment – I just don’t have the means to run 10 of each type. I’m more curious to see if the average Joe can get the same results as the super popular Vipar with half the power – I don’t aim to provide much meaningful data from it.
One reason I went with the HLG 65 is the price of it. If people can spend about the same as the Vipar and get equal results with half the power, that’s a good deal. I am confident that the 135W kit would blow it out of the water and felt this would be a more equal matchup.
Any chance were going to see an update video soon? 😉