Hello All,
fairly new to the world of LED chips I might need some help from some of the wizards here.
I'm a darkroom printer that wants to build a new exposure unit using UV LEDs as a point light source.
my setup would be a cube with 16x 100w chips, 2m away from my exposure plane, with: 4x 365nm + 12x 395nm
Regarding the circuit itself I would want to be able to switch to 3 positions: 365nm alone, 395nm alone, or both.
the LEDs I'm looking at are rated at 100w, 30-36 Forward Voltage, 3500mA tops
here for 365 https://www.lumixtar.com/100w-uv-365nm- ... r-led.html
here for 395 https://www.lumixtar.com/100w-uv-390nm- ... r-led.html
How would you guys go about this ?
Would mounting in series 4 LEDs to their dedicated driver make sense or is it overkill ?
I obviously need power for short exposure times but my understanding is also that the more power the more heat loss, such that running less mA % to the chip could sometimes be beneficial...
Regarding the rest of the system I'm looking at passive heatsinks with 2x fans for an airflow inside my cube and as an option a 10A auto-switch-off box after my exposures are completed (20mns tops for the longest exposures).
If one of you guys is excited to brainstorm with me, I could use the tips
Many thanks,
v
Exposure Unit
What's the total power you want to put down? 16x100W is an awful lot of UV. You're right that running them at lower power would improve efficiency & reliability.
The specs on those LEDs is woefully weak, hardly any voltage vs current data. Some assumptions might have to be made.
The specs on those LEDs is woefully weak, hardly any voltage vs current data. Some assumptions might have to be made.
With the unit being at a 2/2.5m distance from the exposure plane to cover over 1m2,
something like 1000-1200µw/cm2 with the 4x 365nm chips, 2000-2400µw/cm2 with the 12x 395nm chips.
The two wavelength are meant for different needs, they won't run simultaneously.
Regarding the COB specs I requested a proper data sheet indeed.
something like 1000-1200µw/cm2 with the 4x 365nm chips, 2000-2400µw/cm2 with the 12x 395nm chips.
The two wavelength are meant for different needs, they won't run simultaneously.
Regarding the COB specs I requested a proper data sheet indeed.
The folks at Waveform/realUV™ seem to have a bit more info about their products. Maybe ask them a few questions.vassili wrote: ↑Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:24 pmHello All,
fairly new to the world of LED chips I might need some help from some of the wizards here.
I'm a darkroom printer that wants to build a new exposure unit using UV LEDs as a point light source.........
If one of you guys is excited to brainstorm with me, I could use the tips
Many thanks,
v
https://store.waveformlighting.com/coll ... lood-light
https://www.waveformlighting.com/datasheets/CS_7022.pdf
https://www.waveformlighting.com/photom ... 022.95.pdf
https://www.waveformlighting.com/photom ... 022.65.pdf
"The Fool doth thinks thyself wise, but the Wise knows thyself to be a fool."
Hey all, thanks for this.
Pushed my research and figured out I could run my 16x100w COBs at 50% power (3500mA > 1750mA)
with a better UV output than what 50w would give me.
Is it good to assume I only need 3 drivers in the end ? I was looking into the Meanwell HVGC series (C.C.).
I could have one for my 4x365nm Leds in series and 2 for 12x395nm Leds (2x 6 in series).
Many thanks for the help !
Pushed my research and figured out I could run my 16x100w COBs at 50% power (3500mA > 1750mA)
with a better UV output than what 50w would give me.
Is it good to assume I only need 3 drivers in the end ? I was looking into the Meanwell HVGC series (C.C.).
I could have one for my 4x365nm Leds in series and 2 for 12x395nm Leds (2x 6 in series).
Many thanks for the help !